My first taste of YA lit
December 29th, 2010 | Filed under: teachingI’ve never been one to get into arguments over whether we should be teaching the classics exclusively in schools or if we should let some young adult fiction jump into the curriculum mix. It always seemed like a no-brainer and a waste of our time to argue the point, because to me if a student is reading she’s already in the game. I’m focused on getting kids to pick up a book in the first place. Once that happens, then I’ll tackle getting them to delve into Shakespeare or Gabriel Garcia Marquez.
But, even though I’ve said these things and learned a great deal about the use of YA lit successfully in classrooms (my methods teacher during my licensure program was a big proponent of using YA lit), I’ve never really read any of it on my own. I’m not sure what was keeping me from cracking open one of these quick and often fulfilling reads, but I never had before this week. I taught a bit of Lawrence Yep to some sixth graders while working as a long-term substitute – we were reading Dragonwings – and Monster by Walter Dean Myers for my methods class, but that’s about it. My knowledge of YA lit was limited to big names like Laurie Halse Anderson and of course Harry Potter and Twilight. Then there was the mountain of YA titles. If I decided to read something, where would I even start?
A group of teachers I follow on Twitter instituted a #bookaday hashtag on Twitter where they would tackle reading, as you guessed, a book a day during their holiday breaks. I’m a slow reader and didn’t want to dedicate myself to a book a day since I would be planted on the couch for half of each day. Sure, I already do that sometimes since I’m not working (yet), but I try to avoid it.
One title I haven’t been able to avoid through tweets and blog posts is The Hunger Games series by Suzanne Collins. I decided to read the first in the three-part series late last week and breezed through it. I felt that sense of wonder and suspense and connection to the characters, something I rarely experience in reading. The last time I felt this compelled by a book was my first time reading A Confederacy of Dunces. Something about Ignatius J. Reilly still tugs at my heart and leaves me thinking and I read the book nearly ten years ago. Sure, there are books I get into and can’t put down, but a true connection to a characters is something very rare for me in reading. I felt this with Katniss Everdeen, the protagonist of The Hunger Games. I’ve only read the first book and am making myself read a “grown up” book in between this and the next part in the series. (I just started White Teeth by Zadie Smith, which given its nearly 500 pages of luscious wordsmithery means it will probably be a little while before I allow myself to tackle the second Hunger Games book Catching Fire.)
I don’t know why I feel this way, but even though Collins’ book is full of serious and teachable themes, such as the influence of reality television on our lives, poverty, and class struggles to name a few, I felt a little tinge of guilt in reading the book. I enjoyed it so much and it falls under that addictive category of young adult fantasy lit that I suppose I felt guilty about not challenging myself with a tougher read. But why do I feel this way? I can’t help but think this comes from years of education where the classics were elevated to royal status and only those that read them could feel proud and “well-read.” Beach reads, chick lit, fantasy, sci-fi, those were never considered “literature.” Now, don’t get me wrong. I definitely see a difference between The Devil Wears Prada and Ulysses – not everything is literature. But I hate the shame that has been tacked onto understanding the difference. If I feel this way, even after leaving high school nearly 10 years ago, how do our students feel?
There was a lively debate on The English Companion Ning recently about “kids reading junk,” and the junk being things like Harry Potter and Twilight. Sure, Harry Potter may not be comparable to 100 Years of Solitude, but shame on the person that sees thousands of children picking up and reading 400+ page books as a bad thing. Reading begets reading and results in learning. We all have our different avenues we ventured down that brought us to avid reading and very rarely were we pre-teens flipping through Dante’s Inferno. I got into serious reading (meaning I did it every day) when I started picking up R.L. Stine books. They were quick, thrilling reads and my 11-year-old self felt quite accomplished as I counted the number of “whole books” I’d read. From there, as I got older, I wanted to pick up “the classics” and read them. I purchased an old copy of The Complete Works of Shakespeare and read “As You Like It.” I didn’t really understand all of it, but I was 15 and trying my best. Then I went on to Catcher in the Rye, considered one of the first YA books. I was mesmerized that this could be considered a classic – something with the same compelling characters I’d learned to love in all of that other “junk” I’d read as a kid. Holden Caulfield wasn’t battling an old ghost sent to kill the cheerleading theme, as was the case with many R.L. Stine books, but he was battling real things that I felt, like worrying about my younger sibling as I grew into role-model status and dealing with adolescent angst. I was hooked into how reading could allow me to escape and relate with characters while working through my own issues and it only grew from there.
I’m intrigued by the idea of teaching The Hunger Games. Eric T. MacKnight, an international teacher I follow on Twitter (@ericmacknight), has his students *read books independently and blog their reactions and analyses. One student’s response to The Hunger Games generated an interesting comments discussion. Check out the student’s blog response to the book and the ensuing discussion in the comments to see what I mean. There are so many avenues one could take, using the books as a jump-off point for projects and discussions. Communist regimes, poverty, class struggles, the increasingly public nature of our private lives, reality TV, even feminism. Katniss Everdeen is, by societal standards, quite a “tomboy.” How does her portrayal differ from female protagonists in other novels? What makes her strong? I appreciated that Collins wrote Katniss in this way because even though I am happy to see kids reading, even if it is Twilight, I can’t help but have a distaste for the boy-crazy damsel in distress portrayed by Bella in Stephanie Myers’s series.
I’m quite the novice when it comes to YA lit, but it doesn’t take a genius to see how these titles can be used as gateways to life-long reading and learning in the classroom and beyond. Thanks to my network on Twitter, I have a great resource of people well-read in YA lit I can turn to for recommendations, but a wonderful resource is the blog YA Lit – The Good, The Bad, The Ugly written by Sara Fuller (@yagoodbadugly). I’ve also been checking out the Goodreads shelves of Donalyn Miller (@donalynbooks), author of The Book Whisperer: Awakening the Inner Reader in Every Child, which is still high on my to-read list.
If you’re a YA noob like myself, I encourage you to give it a spin and consider how you might work such a title into your curriculum. It’s not much of a stretch. I did a lesson in my methods class tying an Edgar Allen Poe short story to Monster through the concept of unreliable narrators and their effects on readers. It’s easy and you might just snag some of those reluctant readers.
* My apologies to Eric! I thought he taught the book in class, but it turns out one student just read it as an independent reading assignment and blogged her reactions.
Tags: "the classics", Catcher in the Rye, Catching Fire, curriculum, Donalynn Miller, Edgar Allen Poe, Eric T. MacKnight, fantasy, fiction, Harry Potter, Laurie Halse Anderson, literature, R.L. Stine, reading, Sara Fuller, Suzanne Collins, The Book Whisperer, The Hunger Games, Twilight, Walter Dean Myers, White Teeth, YA lit, young adult, Zadie Smith 9 Comments »
I love YA lit, but I don’t make the time to read it unless I have to. In my classes, too, I included a mix of classics and YA books. We often found connections between the two, and as you said, those connections made for thoughtful discussions. My problem now is that I rarely make time for anything that isn’t education/social media connected. (I loved Donalyn’s book, by the way. )
I too have to make time to try new things like YA lit. I got really into nonfiction for a while, history and food politics stuff, but really wanted to learn how to love fiction again. I don’t know how to explain it, but it was hard for me to get back into fiction after reading non-fiction and education books. I really need to get Donalyn’s book on my Kindle! Thanks for the response.
– Mary
It was great to re-read Tina’s blog post—thanks!
One small correction, though: I’ve never taught ‘Hunger Games’. It’s a book that some of my students have read for Independent Reading.
Oh, and . . . the only thing ‘communist’ about China these days is the ruling party’s name. Otherwise it’s capitalism running amok.
As for your main point: I agree entirely ;^ ).
Cheers,
Eric
Eric,
Thanks for the clarification! I at first thought you’d taught the book, but it’s good to see everyone getting into the discussion even if it is “only” for independent reading. I find China so interesting in that it’s capitalism under a communist banner. Wonder what the real communists think 😉 Tina had some really great reflections on the book. How often do your students have to report on independent reading?
– Mary
Mary,
As a science and math person, I am far from an expert in YA matters. That said, what I find fascinating is the question of what constitutes literature? I won’t stir that pot but only say that young people need things/stories that relate to their daily lives and interests. As a parent of 2 YA readers, I am thrilled that they can sit for hours on end reading through a series. As a science and math person, I work very hard trying to find ancillary materials that can foster an interest in the discipline while building connections to the concept being covered. Perhaps YA literature fulfills a similar role. Stimulate a passion and love for reading because that’s the foundation.
I was thrilled over the holiday when my 9th grader wanted to purchase a book on French poetry. She was excited with the playful nature of the words she recited to me albeit I had no idea what she was saying. Let’s just say I enjoyed watching her excitement and passion flourish.
I know I am out of my element here, but are the perceptions that the classics are a must by a certain age just another example of an outdated curricular philosophy? One thing is certain, science and math can certainly use a revamping and maybe YA is just that
Hiram,
Thank you for bringing your science/math perspective to the discussion! I’m not sure it’s a generational thing, because I’ve met young and old educators who are staunchly on the side of “nothing but the classics in my room.” And there are many big names in English education that believe YA lit should only be used for leisure reading and couldn’t possibly be used in the study of literature (Carol Jago, president of NCTE, is one of the biggest voices on that side). Many teachers see it as their job to introduce students to things they might otherwise never consider reading, which for many kids is “the classics.” I don’t dispute that, but I also see it as my job to get students excited about reading just to read – to get them on a path to life-long learning. For many of the students I’ve worked with, getting them just to write something every day and read something every day is a big achievement. I would never say “great work, but soon we need to get you reading some REAL literature.” Maybe I’m a little too hippy dippy in my philosophy, but every step is a success even if it’s not on a strict curriculum path dotted with Shakespeare and Nathaniel Hawthorne. It’s about the journey.
As a math and science teacher, I’m sure you struggle with these same issues – how to get students hooked in even in the slightest. That’s your biggest battle – forget crossing off formulas and concepts that must be studied that year. If the kids don’t care or aren’t interested, what does it matter? I am struggling in my Dutch study because much of the textbook material is out of context and unimportant to me. But you know what I learned and have never forgotten? Cooking terms and food items, because that’s one of my hobbies and I’m passionate about it.
I guess this whole YA versus classics debate really bums me out because I get a sense that it’s a bit of a pissing contest over who has the student’s best interest in mind when really we should be compromising and figuring out how to work them both in with creative plans.
Thanks for getting me riled up again about this!
– Mary
Also, in doing a bit of googling I found the first chapter of this book (published by NCTE) available free online in PDF. It’s called Teaching YA Lit Through Differentiated Instruction. The forward is by the opinionated (and hilarious) author and teacher Alan Sitomer and might be worth a read for all educators, not just those in the language arts.
https://secure.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Books/Sample/33705Intro_Chap01_x.pdf
As a teacher-librarian at a high school, I read YA all school year. The kids love it when I recommend a book because I have read it!
YA lit has a bad rep from years ago and is working hard to change this.
Maybe Hunger Games will be a classic in the future!
I think Hunger Games has the potential to reach classic status one day. I’m in The Netherlands and educators over here are starting to treat Harry Potter as something worth teaching in the classroom. There is hope!